Can Bibi Cover-up Real Story of Oct. 7?
Jan. 2, 2024—These days, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin “Bibi” Netanyahu is finding himself under increasing pressure to explain what really happened on Oct. 7, when Hamas fighters crossed the border into Israel from Gaza and slaughtered 1,200 Israelis and took 250 hostages.
Foreign Minister Eli Cohen, as quoted in the Hebrew-language daily,
Maariv, blamed the Israeli government for the deadly attack, stating that it bears the ultimate responsibility for what occurred. Minister Cohen called for the Knesset to set up an investigative committee to hold those who were negligent responsible. Minister Cohen was quick to add that while he questioned the immediate response of the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) to the Oct. 7 attack, he fully supported the IDF in carrying out the government’s policies in Gaza as necessary countermeasures.
Bibi, however, must, at all costs, prevent a real and thorough investigation of the events of Oct. 7, as intelligence specialists in Israel and in the U.S. say that all signs point to the attack being
deliberately orchestrated by Netanyahu himself and his bloodthirsty cabal who desired it as an excuse to begin their ethnic cleansing operations against the Palestinians in their desire to end, now and for ever, the possibility of a sovereign Palestinian state.
These sources, which include former Israeli intelligence officers familiar with the border defense measures, as well as Israeli operatives inside Hamas, including informants at the leadership level, say that those operatives provided the Israeli intelligence services a detailed plan for the attack
a year before it took place, confirming a report printed in the
New York Times last month. That
Times report indicated that the IDF leadership had dismissed the plan as impossible of being carried out by Hamas, and therefore took no precautions or pre-emptive actions despite receiving further evidence of Hamas training and planning for the attack.
These sources further say that the Prime Minister received a different assessment, based on information from informants and operatives inside Hamas, that indicated the attack
would take place, and gave an approximate time-frame. Bibi could have contradicted the IDF assessments and ordered countermeasures. Instead, he did nothing and even gave approval to plans to redeploy IDF units responsible for patrolling the border, which is the most heavily watched in the world, sending them to the West Bank to protect members of his crazy religious coalition partners who live there, and who were acting so as to provoke Palestinians there.
In addition, Israeli authorities approved an outdoor DJ-music festival to take place but a stone’s throw from the border, and then did not provide it any protection, even though such action is standard operating procedure, especially in border areas.
As one source stated,
“Nothing adds up. Nothing makes any sense, unless you assume that someone
wanted the attack to take place and
wanted all those people killed. That someone, most people think, would be Bibi. He was orchestrating this—or that’s what you can reasonably conclude. He may not have known the exact timing, but he knew enough to take actions over a period of time and said and did nothing. He had been open about his support for the Hamas before, which people understood as a play to block a two-state solution, which the Hamas leadership did not support. Now he calls for their extermination, perhaps to destroy the evidence of what he has done.”
On Dec. 31, the
Times doubled down on their story of the “incompetence” of the IDF and Israeli intelligence as creating what they label as the failure of Oct. 7. However, in this article, the authors indicate that possibility that the arrogance and belligerence of the Netanyahu government and Bibi himself may have contributed to the failure. The article, which contains interviews of IDF figures, past and presently serving, as well others, never once mentions the penetration of Hamas by Israeli operatives and the fact that the Prime Minister is briefed on their reports and assessments. The article is clearly intended to provide the script for what some would want to be a partial, and thereby fake, investigation of the events leading up to Oct. 7 and the IDF response that day.
It is far from certain whether this cover-up can hold, another source stated, as too many people have an idea as to what really happened, and it disgusts them.