Trump Assassination Investigation Ignores Reality of Who Shot at Trump and Why
July 19—Security and intelligence specialists say that the ongoing investigation into the July 13 attempted assassination of former President and GOP Presidential nominee Donald Trump is barking up every wrong tree possible to avoid discovering what really happened: This was a high-risk professional assassination attempt in which the alleged shooter Thomas Matthew Crooks, was likely used as a diversion.
These sources have concluded, on the evidence at hand, that Crooks, whose head was blown off by a Secret Service sniper team stationed behind Trump above the makeshift stage at the Butler Farm Fairgrounds immediately after shots were fired, was not the shooter, which is contrary to what the massively corrupt FBI has concluded. The FBI claims that the weapon recovered on the roof on which Crooks was perched some 400 feet from the podium, an AR-15, reportedly with a scope, was the weapon from which all shots were fired, which in addition to nicking Trump’s right ear, killed one person and wounded two others.
“But the AR-15 is not a sniper rifle. It doesn’t fire precise and accurate shots,” said a source. “It’s what’s called an assault rifle, capable of killing people at close range and getting off shots quickly. Bullets fired from such a rifle tumble when they hit their target; they don’t spin at a high rotation, which is what is required for accuracy over distance.
“And why is it,” asked the source, “that five days after the event, of the 'five to eight' shots reportedly hurled at Trump, we still don’t know exactly how many shots were fired? Haven’t all the bullets been recovered? Many were fired with precision and accuracy as head shots. Could those have been fired from an AR-15? Possibly, but not likely. And only by someone who is a trained sniper—or assassin, And this kid was not that. So, where is the other shooter and why is no one looking for him? That I can answer: because the people who organized this hit don’t want him found.”
This and other sources point to the initial media reports that said there were at least two shooters, one of whom (Crooks) was shot dead. These reports disappeared in later reporting. In addition, a forensic lab at the University of Colorado, reported to have analyzed the audio track of the shooting, has concluded that there were at least two, and possibly three different weapons being discharged among the eight shots reportedly fired. Further, Trump himself has said that he heard a second bullet whizzing by his head. If true, that is not the sound made by an AR-15 bullet.
And, then there are reports about Crooks himself, who was acting strangely for hours prior to the shooting in a manner to draw attention to himself. The latest reports speak of law enforcement and others observing Crooks riding around on his bicycle through the rally site, carrying a rangefinder which he brought through security who noted the oddity of it at such an event, but didn’t question him or confiscate it. And finally, the fact that he was seen going up onto the roof of the American Glass Research building, which was left strangely unsecured—even though days before it was noted that this roof had a clear line of fire at the podium from around 400 feet, and even though, according to Secret Service Director Kimberly Cheatle, that same building was being used by local police as a watch post for snipers—for more than a half hour before the shots were fired. All these facts were in the hands of trained Secret Service professionals, who none-the-less, failed to intercept Crooks and allowed Trump to go on stage. Why?
Much has been made of these facts, One source contacted pointed to another fact:
“Crooks was profiling himself as a threat. It was almost too obvious, and may have been dismissed as such. But it should have raised another question: Maybe he was a diversion, and there was something else at play. When you see something like that, you need to make a decision. Is someone running a stress test to see how you respond, or is this a live threat, or is this just some weirdo who wants attention, but is not a real threat?
“If you understand the larger picture—Trump’s role in the world, and the enemies that he has made in NATO for opposing its stupid war against Russia in Ukraine, and if you know that NATO has assets embedded in various U.S. government agencies, including our intelligence, law enforcement, and security apparatus, and if you know that NATO runs an international assassination bureau, which has the capability to execute a hit on Trump or others, and then to launder that act as a feature of ‘the climate of violence’ that pervades and pollutes Western society—well then, you have the “facts” that should have told you that something was up, and that you needed to pull Trump from that rally before he got anywhere close to the podium.”
This and other sources pointed to reports, that along with his cell phone, a microwave transmitter was found near Crooks’ dead body. These sources speculated that this device might have been intended to be used to create a diversion by blowing up explosives in Crooks’ car parked near the rally site. That explosion might have diverted attention for the actual shooter or shooters—not necessarily Crooks himself, to get off more shots, that could have claimed Trump’s life.
It is not clear why the explosives were not detonated. The pace of events may have sped up when a local police officer, when boosted up toward the roof, saw Crooks, who then pointed his weapon at the officer, who dropped eight feet to the ground to escape possible fire from Crooks, who then almost immediately opened fire toward Trump.
That sequence of events, as well as Trump turning his head in a direction opposite to what might have been expected, and then, because of his training in these matters, quickly dropping to the floor, likely saved his life. For whatever reason, incompetence or worse, the Secret Service did little to protect him.
If you understand what Global NATO is really trying to do, then you also realize that this operation was not merely about eliminating an “enemy,” Donald Trump. The network of militaries, security and intelligence services, and the financial elites above them, are making a play for a world dictatorship that sits above all governments and their elected officials, putting them all in lockstep toward a confrontation with NATO’s declared enemies, Russia and China, and all nations that would defy its rule. The intention can be correctly gleaned from the two major documents issued at the July 9-11 NATO Summit in Washington, “The Washington Summit Declaration,” and “The Ukraine Compact,” and signed onto by the weak and mentally mostly missing President “Sleepy Joe” Biden.
Sleepy Joe is precisely the kind of complacent and stupid puppet that NATO wants in the Oval Office. More importantly, NATO wants a weak Presidency and a weak United States that will go along with its plans.
A successful hit on Trump, timed to be executed just before the Republican Party’s convention in Milwaukee would have stopped him from being nominated as the Party’s candidate for President, and would likely have stopped another opponent of NATO’s war in the Ukraine, Ohio Senator J.D. Vance, from being selected as the Party’s candidate for Vice President. Trump’s death would have thrown the convention and the country into total chaos.
“That would have provided the cover to trigger violent clashes between controlled ‘left’ and ‘right’ counter-gangs controlled by NATO’s assets,” said a source. “They want this country plunged into a new civil war, from which we would emerge as a ‘law-and-order’ fascist police state which most people would accept, in order to control the violence and terror.
“So, NATO is likely to try to hit Trump again, or Vance, or other figures. Even Sleepy Joe is not safe, as some people want him out of the way, too. This is still NATO’s plan, unless the American people stop them. If we unify, it must be around something, not necessarily Trump or any political figure. It should be in defense of our American Constitutional Republic, by making an issue of ending U.S. involvement in NATO and its wars, including its war on our Republic, and in that way, allow Trump, if elected, to do the job of a President.”