Will NATO Kill Trump?: Concerns Raised After NSS Release
Dec. 13—Sources in the intelligence community have expressed concern for the life of President Donald Trump after he authorized the release of the National Security Strategy 2025, which clearly says that NATO is on a policy track contrary to the interests of the United States.
The document, released Dec. 4, says that it is a top priority for U.S. national security to end NATO's war in Ukraine against Russia, which the European leadership of NATO wants to continue, despite the fact that the war is already lost and Russia threatens to rout the NATO-backed Ukrainian forces. The NSS says that NATO has exaggerated alleged Russian threats to invade Western Europe to justify its existence, and that the United States seeks a workable and peaceful relationship with Russia.
Analysts Warn of NATO’s Future
Several analysts, both here and in Europe, fear that the document, which is said to reflect the President’s thinking, is effectively calling for an end to the U.S. relationship with NATO, leaving Europe to fight the monsters it has created, without America. This would mean, as many Europeans have already said, an end to NATO, since the alliance rests on the assurance of U.S. protection, including with its nuclear weapons, to thwart any Russian attack.
While Trump himself, as well as his spokesman, have denied this extreme interpretation of the NSS, “the handwriting is on the wall,” said a source on this side of the Atlantic. “NATO is finished. Trump has always been perceived as an enemy of NATO and its policy of expansion towards the borders of Russia, after the U.S. government had promised the Russians that this would not take place during the negotiations that paved the way for German reunification. Trump believes America, starting with Bill Clinton, should have never reversed this policy and that he, Donald Trump, wants to set things right. He accepts the Russian premise that NATO’s expansion provoked the Russian invasion of Ukraine and he will never agree, as the Europeans, NATO, and their puppet Ukrainian dictator [Volodymyr] Zelenskyy insist that Ukraine be allowed to join NATO.”
Allegations of Sanction Against Trump
This and other sources say that the NATO European leadership and forces in the financial capitals of Paris, Brussels, and London, and its Wall Street base in the U.S., have reached the conclusion that Trump intends to force dissolution and that they have likely now authorized a sanction on him—his elimination—by any means available. They have also reached the conclusion that no one but Trump could drive home this policy change, which marks an end to the post-Soviet Union period of globalism, dominated by the United States on a NATO/British leash, that created a period of “endless wars.” Their assessment is that there is no strong figure who could pull off such a policy shift other than Trump, and that divisions in the elites as well as in Trump’s own administration would doom these efforts if Trump were removed.
NATO, these sources say, runs a global assassination bureau with assets scattered around the globe. In the past, this operation, which has targeted European and Third World leaders, has been interconnected with the Israelis, but also with the American CIA.
Historical Parallels and Assassination Claims
However, this administration, under the direction of Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, has distanced itself, if not severed all ties to the NATO murder machine. Those ties, sources report, are maintained through individuals and networks that have collaborated in the past. Such operations were, sources believe, at work in the assassinations of President John F. Kennedy and, four-plus years later, his brother Robert F. Kennedy. These sources say that they were involved in all subsequent hits or hit attempts on Presidents or high-ranking American officials, whose tracks, as in the case of the Kennedys’ assassinations, are covered up and focus misdirected, through NATO’s extensive propaganda machine, onto various “lone assassins.”
Former President Lyndon Johnson, who succeeded the slain Kennedy in office, when asked in an interview in Look magazine shortly before his death whether he believed the findings of the Warren Commission that Kennedy was killed by a lone assassin, Lee Harvey Oswald, acting alone, said that he did not. Instead, he told the shocked interviewer that this country was involved in running “an international assassination bureau” that handled such things.
Trump in NATO’s Crosshairs
Sources here say that Trump, especially as he ran for his second term and since he has assumed office, has been in NATO’s crosshairs. And in the aftermath of NATO’s endless wars, which until Trump, America was a willing and leading participant, you now have the availability of weapons and targeting that were formerly available to only a handful of specialists, now available to anyone who can be easily trained for a hit. In addition, you have literally hundreds of thousands of walking time bombs, trained in the military and even in some cases from special assassin units, who can and will at some point “go off” in a mass killing spree—or, with covert help and direction, in some cases handled casually, be deployed for a hit or to cover for a professional hit.
These sources say, for example, that there are still many questions that have not been answered about Trump’s near assassination on the campaign trail in Butler, Pa., in July 2024. For example, was Thomas Matthew Crooks the only shooter or simply the only shooter identified? And why was he not on a watch list, when there was clear and known evidence that would have placed him on one? The sources are quick to point out that the agency responsible for making such an investigation, the FBI, was directed by a Biden administration with clear animus towards Trump and slavish support for NATO. What Crooks knew will not be known, as he was eliminated as part of the operation, allegedly killed by Secret Service snipers only after he had fired at Trump.
Precautions and Warnings
These sources say that Trump is aware of the threat to his life and has taken certain precautions. But, these sources say, nonetheless, there is a media effort to focus not on directed hits, but on the general “social malaise” that has caused a ramp-up in violence, in the form of mass killing events, and threats against Trump coming, according to Trump’s people, from the liberals and the left. In this climate of violent confusion, cover can be given to a directed hit.
“Trump is not going to do this, but it needs to be done,” said a source. “If there is a hit on President Trump, it will not be coming from the ‘usual suspects.’ It won’t come from the left, although it could be laundered as such. It is not coming from the Iranians or even Maduro’s people in Venezuela. It is not coming from Palestinians like Hamas, or even from the Israelis. It will be initiated, organized, and directed by NATO, with involvement from British intelligence. The hit or sanction may have already been ordered, but that does not mean that it will succeed. Saying NATO will be behind it, saying it loud and clearly, will help prevent it from happening.”