Will They Execute Trump?
June 2—The immediate results of the much-publicized conviction of the former and would-be future President Donald Trump in his sham trial for manipulating the records of his hush money payoffs to porn star Stormy Daniels has been to increase his lead over his rival, President “Sleepy Joe” Biden, according to both GOP internal and other polling information; and to surge money into his campaign coffers—not exactly the results desired by the Biden and Establishment operatives who have been dragging Trump in and out courtrooms for well over a year.
Nor has the ordeal shattered Trump’s confidence in his ultimate return to the White House, but instead has made him more combative: “You know, I am a warrior,” the told the New York Post in an interview, in which he pledged, that as President, he would clean up the hopelessly corrupt justice system that has allowed for his enemies to wield it as a political weapon against him.
The prosecution and conviction is such a sham, that even Sen. Mitt Romney (R-Utah), one of Trump’s most strident critics within his own party, has called what happened a total miscarriage of justice, stating that the charges were clearly made up, and should not have been tried.
Intelligence sources, however, report that the apparent failure of any legal strategy to take Trump out, or even slow down his likely re-ascent up the steps to the White House next January, is setting in motion a deadly plan, supported in the same dark circles of the Establishment and military industrial complex that once ordered and orchestrated the assassination of President John F. Kennedy in Dallas in 1963. These sources say that a planned “sanction” of Trump will also have the support and complicity of NATO and the global financial elite, whose power is centered in the City of London and its Wall Street satrap, just as the hit on Kennedy found similar support and assistance.
Trump has no friends in these circles. Despite his tough talk to the contrary, Trump is known to oppose direct confrontation with either Russia or China. He prefers to view them as competitors, who occasionally get out of line, but does not see them as existential threats, as do many of the neocon and neo-liberal ideologues who populate the policy establishment. Taking this a step farther, he believes that he understands and is able to deal with both Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping, both of whom he believes understand him, and that because of this, he can find some common ground.
In addition, Trump has openly questioned the reason for the NATO alliance, stating that he does not see a reason or a need for the U.S. to go to war for Europe, since he doesn’t think Putin has any intention to attack Europe. Openly questioning Article 5, the mutual defense clause of the NATO treaty, Trump believes Europe should be prepared to defend itself, and not seek to engage the U.S. in wars of its own making. If Europe won’t agree to defend itself, as it sees fit, then perhaps the U.S. needs to walk away from NATO, Trump has suggested, in various interviews.
“Such thoughts send shivers up the spines of these NATO blowhards,” said a source. “And they are also seen as a declaration of war against the military-industrial complex in this country, which as President Dwight Eisenhower famously and correctly warned, holds the elected government of our country under its thumb on crucial policy matters.
“Those NATO blowhards say Trump is dangerously unstable, and in some ways he is—to them. He may do none of these things, and in his last go-’round in the White House, they were successful in hijacking his Administration for their purposes, steering it away from his deal-making with Xi and Putin. In their minds, Trump is a throwback, taking steps away from the globalist strategy that is driving the confrontation with Russia and China.
“Where Trump sort of coincides with their interest, at least nominally, is in his desire to make America first—in their terms the world hegemon—but, it is like he is several degrees off from their center. For example, he might just want to get America involved with all these grand infrastructure projects the Russians and the Chinese and the BRICS alliance are pushing, that this establishment opposes. In his mind, it is better to make money than war, and if the expense of war can be avoided, so much the better. He will spend like crazy on the military to build up America’s strength, so that it does not need to fight wars, especially the endless ones of recent years.
“He is a mixed bag, but a dangerous one, thinks NATO/globalist Establishment,” the source continued. “So keep him out of the White House by any means necessary.”
But, as this source and others stressed, for some who would say yes to a hit on Trump, there is something much darker in the plan. They are not thinking so much about the danger of a Trump presidency, as they desire to plunge the U.S. and its government into chaos. To this group, which is based in NATO and in British establishment, including within the GCHQ of British intelligence, while China and Russia represent threats, the American republic, which will soon celebrate the 250th anniversary of its independence from the British Empire, represents, in potential, the most devastating threat to their global imperial system.
Were America to rediscover its roots as a republic and come to its senses, it could successfully end the global imperial system forever—especially now, with the financial component of that system hopelessly bankrupt and its ability to impose its will challenged by an emerging Global Majority, led by the BRICS nations. Under proper leadership, America could walk away from the globalists and join with this new Global Majority in the creation of a completely new World Order, featuring a durable peace based on mutually cooperative and beneficial development.
“A hit on Trump,” the source stated, “with the assistance of some money and organization from this global elite, could plunge this nation into a crisis leading to a new civil war, which would destroy and break up our republic—reversing the positive revolutionary process which created our nation. It is not hard to see this happening. There will likely not be a free and fair election come November 5, or maybe even any election at all. That is, if this crowd doesn’t blow us all up in a thermonuclear war before then."
The propaganda warmup by NATO to make such a hit on Trump a credible possibility in the eyes of the public is already well underway. In the aftermath of the recent attempted assassination of Slovakian Prime Minister Robert Fico, a vocal opponent of the NATO war in the Ukraine whose hit is thought by informed intelligence sources to have likely been orchestrated by NATO, using an extensive support network for the "lone assassin" gunmen, the media sought to deflect such informed speculation by attributing its cause to be Fico's "extreme divisiveness" as a "polarizing" political figure. In other words, if you exhibit these tendencies as a political leader, someone might pop you. The establishment propaganda machine constantly refers to Trump as "divisive" and "polarizing"
Trump can help defeat this planned outcome by openly warning that the people who are orchestrating his legal persecutions, seeing their failure, may try to eliminate him. He can say it any way he wants to, but he needs to say it loud and strong and repeatedly. Warn against the plot to destroy this country that needs to be investigated. Call on his supporters to make sure they understand the message, and spread it all around. Even those who don’t support Trump need to say it. And at all times, he must ensure he has adequate physical protection, and not merely from Federal sources. After all, it’s not really about him; it’s about saving this country.