July 31—Executive Intelligence Review, acting in the tradition of responsibility toward the Presidency of the United States undertaken by its founder, economist Lyndon LaRouche, publishes as its lead today the Introduction to the forthcoming White Paper issued by The LaRouche Organization: “Worse Than Treason—The Actual Motive Behind ‘Russiagate.’” There are three crucial conceptions that appear in this document, to which we call attention.

Conception Number One: “What DNI Gabbard has released thus far, shows that in August, September, and early December of 2016, the intelligence community had determined that Russia was neither capable of, nor interested in hacking U.S. election infrastructure to affect the outcome of the presidential election.” Instead of this new emphasis, which definitively removes Russia from any espionage role like that claimed for the past nine years—and vindicates former National Security Agency whistleblower Bill Binney and his associates, including former CIA operatives Larry Johnson and Ray McGovern, as well as many other members of Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity who challenged this false claim from the time it was made nine years ago—everyone is still being encouraged to only focus upon the important, but secondary angle that “the Obama Administration did it”—thus letting off the “originating agent” behind Russiagate, which was not the Obama Administration.

Conception Number Two: “What has not yet been mentioned by Gabbard, other than limited reference to the ‘Steele Dossier,’ is the role of British intelligence in manufacturing the Russiagate story, and the role played by key individuals such as GCHQ Director Robert Hannigan, MI6 Chief Richard Dearlove, former Prime Minister Tony Blair, and others.” This is crucial, both because this, not Russia, was the foreign threat against the United States which illegally sought to determine the outcome of the 2016 American Presidential election, by America’s historical enemy, and because both Dearlove and Blair are all over the disastrous Trump Administration policy in the Middle East right now.

Conception Number Three: “The reason for the British-orchestrated confrontation between the United States and Russia was so that the British could consolidate a global financial empire based on depopulation and looting raw materials and labor.” China’s Belt and Road Initiative and the BRICS New Development Bank, launched in 2013 and 2014, respectively, posed a great threat to what King Charles has called “Global Britain.” This, and nothing else, is the actual motivation behind the disastrous “American realist” policies toward China, and the supremely stupid economic policies of self-destruction being pursued by the United States.

In fact, the United States’ primary allies, were it to re-adopt its once-traditional policy of investment in mining, manufacturing, agriculture, advanced nuclear fission and thermonuclear fusion research and development, and the correlated advanced machine-tool design, would in fact be the very Russia and China that are today said to be its enemies! The Lincoln Administration understood the role of Great Britain. The Franklin Roosevelt Administration understood the role of Great Britain. And 200 years ago, the Presidency of American Revolution veteran John Quincy Adams (1825-29) exemplified an independent American foreign and domestic policy, which he had eloquently expressed in his 1821 Fourth of July speech to the Congress, delivered in his capacity as Secretary of State.

Only if the Presidency has the courage to name the names of the real “perfidious Albion” perpetrators of Russiagate, the real foreign enemy of America, and the real War Party will the drive toward thermonuclear war with Russia possibly be contained. The world security and development architecture proposed and detailed by participants in the two Schiller Institute conferences held in the past three months is the clear pathway forward. This can work, but only if the American Presidency leaves the obsolete, hostile fantasy world of “unipolarity” and its NATO bastard child behind. By recommitting to its original anti-colonialist purpose, America can yet liberate the trans-Atlantic world from the radioactive fate to which it seeks to condemn mankind. All that is needed is to summon what the assassinated Yitzhak Rabin called “the courage to change axioms.”